Maize is a significant cereal crop in Ethiopia. However, the yield of this crop is declined from time to time due to continuous use of DAP and urea for a long season, which resulted in deficiency of other important nutrients and due to absence of the right fertilizer with the right rate at the right time. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted at chora district during the 2021 main cropping season to assess the effect of blended NPSB fertilizer rates supplemented with inorganic N fertilizer on maize grain yield and yield components and to determine the economically optimum levels of blended NPSB and N required to give higher yield of maize. The treatment consisted of factorial combination of five levels of blended NPSB (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200kg/ha) and four levels of N (0, 23, 46 and 69kg/ha) fertilizer rates. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Analysis of the results revealed that, plant height (PH), above ground dry biomass (AGDB kg/ha), grain yield (GY kg/ha) and stalk yield (SY kg/ha) were highly significantly affected by main effect of blended NPSB and N rates, as well as by their interaction, while number of cob per plot (NCPP), cob length (CL), number of grains per cob (NGPC), thousand kernel weight (TKW gm) and harvest index (HI%) were significantly affected by main effect of blended NPSB and N rates, as well as by their interaction. Only number of rows per cob (NRPC) was not significantly affected by both main effects of blended NPSB and N rates, as well as their interaction. The result showed that, the highest grain yield (7026.4kg/ha) and net benefit (89020 ETB/ha) with an acceptable marginal rate of return (1010.9%) was obtained from the plot treated with 200kg/ha of NPSB and 69kg/ha of N fertilizer rates. Therefore, based on the result obtained from this study, application of 200kg/ha of blended fertilizer supplemented with 69 kg/ha of N fertilizer can be suggested as profitable for production of maize at the study area and their similar soil conditions and agro-ecologies.
Published in | World Journal of Applied Chemistry (Volume 7, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjac.20220701.13 |
Page(s) | 12-23 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Blended NPSB Fertilizer, N Fertilizer, Grain Yield, Maize
[1] | Abebaw Tadele and Hirpa Legese, 2018. Effects of fertilizer rate (blended) and sowing methods on yield of bread wheat (triticumaestivum) and its economic profitability in western Ethiopia. 5 (7): 9. |
[2] | Akalu T. 2015. On-farm Evaluation of Improved Maize Varieties in Ethiopia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237309549. |
[3] | Ali, M. A., Tariq, N. H., Ahmed, N., Abid, M. and Rahim, A. 2013. Response of Wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) to Soil Applied Boron and Zinc Fertilizers Under Irrigated Conditions. Pak. J. Agri., Agril. Engg., Vet. Sci., 29 (2): 114–125. |
[4] | Bedele meteorological substation, 2021. |
[5] | Bekabil Fufa and Hassan Rashid. 2006. Determinants of fertilizer use on maize in eastern Ethiopia: A weighted endogenous sampling analysis of the extent and intensity of adoption, 45 (1): 38-49. |
[6] | Bouyoucos J (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil. Agronomy Journals 54: 464-465. |
[7] | Bray, H. R. and Kurtz L. T., 1945. Determination of organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science (9): 39-46. |
[8] | CIMMYT (Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo/International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center). (1988). From agronomic data to farmer's recommendations: an economics training manual. Completely revised edition, CIMMYT, Mexico. D. F. 79 pp. |
[9] | CSA(Central Statistical Agency). 2020. Report on area and production of crops(private peasant holdings ‘Meher’ season) 2016/2017. Addis Ababa Ethiopia, the FDRE statistical bulletin, Vol. I. Statistical Bulletin 584, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, April 2017. Pp. 1-12. |
[10] | CSA. 2018. Livestock Population of Ethiopian, Central Statistical Authority, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[11] | Dagne Chimdessa. 2016. Blended Fertilizers Effects on Maize Yield and Yield components of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 5 (5): 151-162. |
[12] | Delorite, R. J. and H. L. Ahlgren. 1967. Crop production. 3rd(ed.). Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. |
[13] | Donald C. M., 1962. In search of yield. Journal of Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 28: 171-178. Egbe O., Alibo S. and Nwueze I. 2010. Evaluation of some extra-early and early maturing cowpea varieties for intercropping with maize in Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal, 1: 845-458. |
[14] | Dowswell, C. R, R. L Paliwal and R. P. Cantrell 1999. Maize in 3rd World. West Views press, Inc. Colorado, USA. |
[15] | Driessen, p., Deckers, j., Spaargaren, O. and Natchtergaele, F. 2001. Lecture notes on the major soils of the world: World Soil Resource Reports 94. FAO, Rome. |
[16] | Ethiopian Soil Information System (EthioSIS). 2013. Soil analysis report. Agricultural Transformation Agency. |
[17] | Fernando S, Julio M, Miralles CDJ and Hugo MP. 2009. Sulfur fertilization improves nitrogen use efficiency in wheat by increasing nitrogen uptake. Field Crops Research, 113 (2): 170–177. |
[18] | Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database (FAOSTAT). 2017. Statistical databases and data-sets of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx |
[19] | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2006. |
[20] | Fufa Anbessa, Thomas Abraham and Habtamu Ashagre. 2019. Influence of Plant Population and NPSB Blended Fertilizer Rates on Yield Parameters and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Bako, Ethiopia. P. 348. |
[21] | Haffanaghel, H. P. 1961. Agriculture in Ethiopia. FAO, Rome. |
[22] | Havlin, J. L., Beaton, J. D., Tisdale, S. L. and Nelson, W. L. 1999. Soil fertility and fertilizer: an introduction to nutrient management Prentice Hall, New York, 499p. |
[23] | Hoeft, R. G., Walsh, L. M. and Keeney, D. R. 1973. Soil Science Society of America, Proceeding, 37: 400-404. |
[24] | Jackson, M. L. 1974. Soil Chemical Analysis. Printice Hall. Ind, Englewood, Chiffs N. J. USA. 284p. |
[25] | Jafer Dawid, 2018. Validation of blended fertilizer for maize production under limed condition of acid soil. Journal of Natural Sciences Research 8 (23): 52-58. |
[26] | Jones, D. I., Dennis, P. G., Owen, A. G. and van Hee, P. A. W. 2003. Organic acid behavior in soils -misconceptions and knowledge gaps. Plant and Soil, 248 (2): 31- 41. |
[27] | Kidanu Motuma and Achalu Chimdi, 2018. Availability of Boron, Sulfur and Zinc and Status of other Selected Soil Properties under Acidic Soils of Different Land Use Types: The Case of Wayu Tuka District, East Wollega Zone. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 18, 17-22. |
[28] | Kinfe Tekulu, Tsadik Tadele, Tewolde Berhe, Weldegebreal Gebrehiwot, Gebresemaeti Kahsu, Solomon Mebrahtom and Goitom Aregawi. 2019. Evaluation of NPSZnB fertilizer levels on yield and yield component of maize (Zea mays L.) at Laelay Adiyabo and Medebay Zana districts, Western Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds. Vol. 10 (2), pp. 54- 63. |
[29] | Livestock Development and Marketing Agency(LDMA). 2010. Annual Progress Report, Livestock Development and Marketing Agency, Oromia, Ethiopia. |
[30] | Manjula V. Nathan John Stecker A. and Yichang Sun, 2012. University Extension Division of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources University of Missouri Revised 1/2012 Soil Testing A Guide for Conducting Soil Tests in Missouri. |
[31] | Martins, Karla V, Durval Dourado-neto, Klaus Reichardt, and Jose L Favarin. 2017. “Maize dry matter production and macronutrient extraction model as a new approach for fertilizer rate estimation” 89: 705–16. |
[32] | Mekuannet Belay and Kiya Adare (2020). Response of growth, yield components, and yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) varieties to newly introduce blended NPS and N fertilizer rates at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 6: 1771115. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1771115 |
[33] | Mesfin,. A. 1998. Nature and management of Ethiopian soils, Alemaya University of Agriculture, Ethiopia. 272p. |
[34] | Murphy HF. 1968. A report on fertility status and other data on some soils of Ethiopia. Experimental station bulletin no. 44. Hailesilassie College of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University. |
[35] | Onasanya, R. O., Aiyelari, O. P., Onasanya, A. S., Oikeh, F. E., & Oyelakin, O. O.(2009). Growth and yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers in Southern Nigeria. IDOSI Publications, 5 (4), 400–407. |
[36] | Orkaido Olte (2004) Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers on Yield And Yield Components of Maize (Zea Mays L.) on Black Soil of Regede Konso Alemaya University at Konso special wereda, southern Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis Presented to Haramaya University, Ethiopia. |
[37] | Osman, A. M. and Mohamed, Z. M. 1981. Yield and yield component of wheat and their inter relationships as influenced by N and seed rate in Sudan. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge. 97: 611-618. |
[38] | Raouf, S. and Ali, N. 2016. Effects of time and rate of nitrogen application on phenology and some agronomical traits of maize (Zea mays L.), BIOLOGIJA. 62 (1): 35–45. |
[39] | Rishid P., 2019. Understanding phosphorus forms and their cycling in the soil. ANR-2535. |
[40] | Rowell, and D. L., 1994. Soil science: Methods and applications. Addison Wesley Longman Limited. England. 350. |
[41] | Sahlemedhin S. and Taye B. 2000. Procedures for Soil and Plant Analysis. National Soil Research Center Technical. Paper 74. NFIA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[42] | SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2008. Statistical Analysis System. SAS institute version 9.20 Cary, NC, USA. |
[43] | Singh, R., & Daoudi, M. (2017). Effect of nitrogen and Sulphur on growth and yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6 (6), 1930–1935 https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.606.22 |
[44] | Tenaw Workayehu. 1977. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rates and plant densities on grain yield of maize. African Crop Sci. J. 8: 273-282. |
[45] | Teng Y. and Timmer V. R. 1994. Nitrogen and phosphorus interactions in an intensively managed nursery soil plant system. American Journal of Soil Science Society, 58: 232-238. |
[46] | Tripathi, S. B. and V. P. Singh. 1982. Relationship between dry matter accumulation and nutrient composition at different stages at Kisan composite maize. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 16: 149-152. |
[47] | Walkley A, Black IA. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science 37 (1): 29-38. |
[48] | Zeidan MS, Amany A, El-Kramany MF. Effect of N-fertilizer and plant density on yield and quality of maize in sandy soil. Res J AgricBiol Sci. 2006; 2 (4): 156–61. |
APA Style
Dechasa Mengistu. (2022). Effects of Blended NPSB and N Fertilizer Rates on Maize (Zea mays L.) Grain Yield and Yield Components in Chora District, Buno Bedele Zone, South Western Ethiopia. World Journal of Applied Chemistry, 7(1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20220701.13
ACS Style
Dechasa Mengistu. Effects of Blended NPSB and N Fertilizer Rates on Maize (Zea mays L.) Grain Yield and Yield Components in Chora District, Buno Bedele Zone, South Western Ethiopia. World J. Appl. Chem. 2022, 7(1), 12-23. doi: 10.11648/j.wjac.20220701.13
AMA Style
Dechasa Mengistu. Effects of Blended NPSB and N Fertilizer Rates on Maize (Zea mays L.) Grain Yield and Yield Components in Chora District, Buno Bedele Zone, South Western Ethiopia. World J Appl Chem. 2022;7(1):12-23. doi: 10.11648/j.wjac.20220701.13
@article{10.11648/j.wjac.20220701.13, author = {Dechasa Mengistu}, title = {Effects of Blended NPSB and N Fertilizer Rates on Maize (Zea mays L.) Grain Yield and Yield Components in Chora District, Buno Bedele Zone, South Western Ethiopia}, journal = {World Journal of Applied Chemistry}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, pages = {12-23}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjac.20220701.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20220701.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjac.20220701.13}, abstract = {Maize is a significant cereal crop in Ethiopia. However, the yield of this crop is declined from time to time due to continuous use of DAP and urea for a long season, which resulted in deficiency of other important nutrients and due to absence of the right fertilizer with the right rate at the right time. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted at chora district during the 2021 main cropping season to assess the effect of blended NPSB fertilizer rates supplemented with inorganic N fertilizer on maize grain yield and yield components and to determine the economically optimum levels of blended NPSB and N required to give higher yield of maize. The treatment consisted of factorial combination of five levels of blended NPSB (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200kg/ha) and four levels of N (0, 23, 46 and 69kg/ha) fertilizer rates. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Analysis of the results revealed that, plant height (PH), above ground dry biomass (AGDB kg/ha), grain yield (GY kg/ha) and stalk yield (SY kg/ha) were highly significantly affected by main effect of blended NPSB and N rates, as well as by their interaction, while number of cob per plot (NCPP), cob length (CL), number of grains per cob (NGPC), thousand kernel weight (TKW gm) and harvest index (HI%) were significantly affected by main effect of blended NPSB and N rates, as well as by their interaction. Only number of rows per cob (NRPC) was not significantly affected by both main effects of blended NPSB and N rates, as well as their interaction. The result showed that, the highest grain yield (7026.4kg/ha) and net benefit (89020 ETB/ha) with an acceptable marginal rate of return (1010.9%) was obtained from the plot treated with 200kg/ha of NPSB and 69kg/ha of N fertilizer rates. Therefore, based on the result obtained from this study, application of 200kg/ha of blended fertilizer supplemented with 69 kg/ha of N fertilizer can be suggested as profitable for production of maize at the study area and their similar soil conditions and agro-ecologies.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effects of Blended NPSB and N Fertilizer Rates on Maize (Zea mays L.) Grain Yield and Yield Components in Chora District, Buno Bedele Zone, South Western Ethiopia AU - Dechasa Mengistu Y1 - 2022/03/12 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20220701.13 DO - 10.11648/j.wjac.20220701.13 T2 - World Journal of Applied Chemistry JF - World Journal of Applied Chemistry JO - World Journal of Applied Chemistry SP - 12 EP - 23 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-5982 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20220701.13 AB - Maize is a significant cereal crop in Ethiopia. However, the yield of this crop is declined from time to time due to continuous use of DAP and urea for a long season, which resulted in deficiency of other important nutrients and due to absence of the right fertilizer with the right rate at the right time. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted at chora district during the 2021 main cropping season to assess the effect of blended NPSB fertilizer rates supplemented with inorganic N fertilizer on maize grain yield and yield components and to determine the economically optimum levels of blended NPSB and N required to give higher yield of maize. The treatment consisted of factorial combination of five levels of blended NPSB (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200kg/ha) and four levels of N (0, 23, 46 and 69kg/ha) fertilizer rates. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Analysis of the results revealed that, plant height (PH), above ground dry biomass (AGDB kg/ha), grain yield (GY kg/ha) and stalk yield (SY kg/ha) were highly significantly affected by main effect of blended NPSB and N rates, as well as by their interaction, while number of cob per plot (NCPP), cob length (CL), number of grains per cob (NGPC), thousand kernel weight (TKW gm) and harvest index (HI%) were significantly affected by main effect of blended NPSB and N rates, as well as by their interaction. Only number of rows per cob (NRPC) was not significantly affected by both main effects of blended NPSB and N rates, as well as their interaction. The result showed that, the highest grain yield (7026.4kg/ha) and net benefit (89020 ETB/ha) with an acceptable marginal rate of return (1010.9%) was obtained from the plot treated with 200kg/ha of NPSB and 69kg/ha of N fertilizer rates. Therefore, based on the result obtained from this study, application of 200kg/ha of blended fertilizer supplemented with 69 kg/ha of N fertilizer can be suggested as profitable for production of maize at the study area and their similar soil conditions and agro-ecologies. VL - 7 IS - 1 ER -