| Peer-Reviewed

Comparative Economic Analysis for Early Maturing and Traditional Maize Varieties in Nzega District, Tabora Region

Received: 17 February 2023     Accepted: 18 March 2023     Published: 31 March 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Nzega is among the districts located in semi-arid areas of Tanzania where drought is a limiting factor for agriculture. The Tanzanian government has started advising farmers to use early maturing maize varieties (EMMV) as a response to frequent droughts. The use of EMMV is one of the factors which can increase maize production. Efforts to promote use of EMMV have not been successful. Most farmers are still using traditional varieties which succumb easily to droughts. Farmers will adopt a certain technology if it is likely to have a significant contribution in improving welfare. The present paper examines the relative profitability of the two maize varieties. The paper uses data collected from 150 maize farmers consisting of adopters and non-adopters of EMMV. Multistage random sampling technique was used to select maize farmers. Data were collected through structured questionnaire. Gross margin was computed and t-test was used to compare the profitability maize varieties. The results show that the gross margin for EMMV is higher than the traditional maize varieties. The gross margin for EMMV is 306396.30Tshs/acre while for Traditional maize varieties the gross margin is 177230.3Tshs/acre. The difference is statistically significant at 0.05 levels. Farmers should be emphasized in using EMMV.

Published in World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (Volume 1, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.wjast.20230101.13
Page(s) 9-12
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Improved Maize Varieties, Cost of Production, Marginal Analysis, Adoption

References
[1] Nkonya E, Xavery P, Akonaay H, Mwangi W, Anandajayasekeram P, Verkuijl H, et al. Maize Production Adoption of Maize.
[2] Kaliba ARM, Verkuijl H, Mwangi W. (2000). Factors Affecting Adoption of Improved Maize Seeds and Use of Inorganic Fertilizer for Maize Production in the Intermediate and Lowland Zones of Tanzania.
[3] Park TA, Florkowski WJ. Selection of Peach Varieties and the Role of Quality Attributes. 2003; 28 (1): 138–51.
[4] Høgh-Jensen H, Myaka FA, Sakala WD, Kamalongo D, Ngwira A, Vesterager JM, Odgaard R, Adu-Gyamfi JJ (2007) Yields and qualities of pigeonpea varieties grown under smallholder farmers’ conditions in Eastern and Southern Africa. Afr J Agric Res 2: 269–278.
[5] Amaza P, Kwacha A, Kamara A. Farmers ’ perceptions, profitability, and factors influencing the adoption of improved maize varieties in the Guinea Savannas of Nigeria.: 10.
[6] Mugisha J, Diiro G. 2010. Explaining the Adoption of Improved Maize Varieties and its Effects on Yields among Smallholder Maize Farmers in Eastern and Central Uganda. 5 (1): 6–13.
[7] Amare M, Asfaw S, Shiferaw B. Welfare impacts of maize – pigeonpea intensification in Tanzania. 2012; 00: 1–17.
[8] Ndaeyo, N. U. (2010). Yields, Cost of Production and Economic Return to Management of Maize / Cassava Intercrop as Influenced by Different Tillage, 2 (10), 68–74.
[9] Raphael, G., (2013). Cost of Production from a typical Small Scale Farm in Tranzoia Country in Kenya. Paper presented at the 4th AAAE CONFERENCE, Hammamet, Tunisia. 77 pp.
[10] Shiferaw B., Okello J., Muricho G., Omiti J., Silim S. and Jones R. (2008). Unlocking the Potential of High-Value Legumes in the Semi-Arid Regions: Analyses of the Pigeonpea Value Chains in Kenya. Research Report No. 1: Institutions, Markets, Policy Impacts. Nairobi, Kenya: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 52pp.
[11] URT (2007). Improved Agricultural Technologies Recommended in Tanzania. The Department of Research and Training. Ministry of Agriculture Food Security and Cooperatives, Dar es Salaam 144pp.
[12] Minot, Nicholas, (2010). Staple Food Prices in Malawi. Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Food Security Collaborative Working Papers.
[13] Suri, T. (2011). Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption. Econometrica, 79 (1), 159–209.
[14] Franzel, S., Ayuk, E., Cunningham, A. B., Duguma, B., & Asanga, C. (2014). Bark for Sale: The Adoption Potential of Prunus africana as an Agroforestry Tree for Small-Scale Farmers in Cameroon. Advances in Economic Botany, 17, 189–208. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43932780
[15] Oluyede Clifford Ajayi, Festus K. Akinnifesi, Gudeta Sileshi, (2007). Adoption of renewable soil fertility replenishment technologies in the southern African region: Lessons learnt and the way forward. Natural Resource Forum. Volume31, Issue 4.
[16] Kafle, B. (2010). Determinants of adoption of improved maize varieties in developing countries. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Science 1 (1): 1-7.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Donatha Raphael Dunda, Damas Philip, Elimboto Ibrahim Muna. (2023). Comparative Economic Analysis for Early Maturing and Traditional Maize Varieties in Nzega District, Tabora Region. World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 1(1), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20230101.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Donatha Raphael Dunda; Damas Philip; Elimboto Ibrahim Muna. Comparative Economic Analysis for Early Maturing and Traditional Maize Varieties in Nzega District, Tabora Region. World J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2023, 1(1), 9-12. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20230101.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Donatha Raphael Dunda, Damas Philip, Elimboto Ibrahim Muna. Comparative Economic Analysis for Early Maturing and Traditional Maize Varieties in Nzega District, Tabora Region. World J Agric Sci Technol. 2023;1(1):9-12. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20230101.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wjast.20230101.13,
      author = {Donatha Raphael Dunda and Damas Philip and Elimboto Ibrahim Muna},
      title = {Comparative Economic Analysis for Early Maturing and Traditional Maize Varieties in Nzega District, Tabora Region},
      journal = {World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology},
      volume = {1},
      number = {1},
      pages = {9-12},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wjast.20230101.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20230101.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjast.20230101.13},
      abstract = {Nzega is among the districts located in semi-arid areas of Tanzania where drought is a limiting factor for agriculture. The Tanzanian government has started advising farmers to use early maturing maize varieties (EMMV) as a response to frequent droughts. The use of EMMV is one of the factors which can increase maize production. Efforts to promote use of EMMV have not been successful. Most farmers are still using traditional varieties which succumb easily to droughts. Farmers will adopt a certain technology if it is likely to have a significant contribution in improving welfare. The present paper examines the relative profitability of the two maize varieties. The paper uses data collected from 150 maize farmers consisting of adopters and non-adopters of EMMV. Multistage random sampling technique was used to select maize farmers. Data were collected through structured questionnaire. Gross margin was computed and t-test was used to compare the profitability maize varieties. The results show that the gross margin for EMMV is higher than the traditional maize varieties. The gross margin for EMMV is 306396.30Tshs/acre while for Traditional maize varieties the gross margin is 177230.3Tshs/acre. The difference is statistically significant at 0.05 levels. Farmers should be emphasized in using EMMV.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Comparative Economic Analysis for Early Maturing and Traditional Maize Varieties in Nzega District, Tabora Region
    AU  - Donatha Raphael Dunda
    AU  - Damas Philip
    AU  - Elimboto Ibrahim Muna
    Y1  - 2023/03/31
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20230101.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wjast.20230101.13
    T2  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    JF  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    JO  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    SP  - 9
    EP  - 12
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7332
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20230101.13
    AB  - Nzega is among the districts located in semi-arid areas of Tanzania where drought is a limiting factor for agriculture. The Tanzanian government has started advising farmers to use early maturing maize varieties (EMMV) as a response to frequent droughts. The use of EMMV is one of the factors which can increase maize production. Efforts to promote use of EMMV have not been successful. Most farmers are still using traditional varieties which succumb easily to droughts. Farmers will adopt a certain technology if it is likely to have a significant contribution in improving welfare. The present paper examines the relative profitability of the two maize varieties. The paper uses data collected from 150 maize farmers consisting of adopters and non-adopters of EMMV. Multistage random sampling technique was used to select maize farmers. Data were collected through structured questionnaire. Gross margin was computed and t-test was used to compare the profitability maize varieties. The results show that the gross margin for EMMV is higher than the traditional maize varieties. The gross margin for EMMV is 306396.30Tshs/acre while for Traditional maize varieties the gross margin is 177230.3Tshs/acre. The difference is statistically significant at 0.05 levels. Farmers should be emphasized in using EMMV.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Research, Tobacco Research Institute of Tanzania, Tabora, Tanzania

  • Department of Agriculture Economics, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Department of Research, Tobacco Research Institute of Tanzania, Tabora, Tanzania

  • Sections