Tef (Eragrostis tef) is one of a crucial cereal crop for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia, providing essential food and nutrition security. Nonetheless, the productivity of tef grain is relatively low (1.94 tha-1), resulting from the limited access to improved varieties by farmers and low adoption of recommended management practices. Hence, this activity was conducted to demonstrate and create awareness of improved tef varieties along with their management practices in six selected potential districts namely, Adea, Lume and Gimbichu districts of East Shewa zone, Gelan and Akaki Kality districts of Sheger city administration and Becho districts of South West Shewa zone of Oromia region. Bishoftu, the newly released variety, was demonstrated along with the standard checks (Eba and Dagim) varieties and the farmers practice during the 2022/23 main planting season. Yield data was collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics, while farmers’ preference and feedback were evaluated using direct ranking and narration methods, respectively. The highest grain yield (25.5 qha–1) was obtained from Bishoftu variety at Akaki kality district while the lowest mean grain yield (20.3 qha–1) was recorded from Eba variety at Adea district of East Shewa zones of Oromia region. A mean grain yield increment of 0.2% to 21.6% was recorded from Bishoftu variety over the standard check Eba variety in all the demonstration sites. Similarly, Bishoftu variety was selected first followed by Dagim and Eba varieties in Adea, Gimbichu and Lume districts while Dagim variety was selected first followed by Bishoftu and Eba variety in the Gelan district of Sheger city administration of Oromia region. Therefore, the selected varieties should be scaled up in the target areas and other similar agro-ecological areas by involving all the concerned stakeholders such as the government sectors, non-governmental organizations and other private sectors at different levels.
Published in | World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.12 |
Page(s) | 5-10 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Eragrostis tef, Grain Yield, Pre-extension, Preference Ranking, Tef Variety
[1] | CSA, “The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency Report on Area and Production of Major Crops,” Stat. Bull., vol. I, p. 132, 2022. |
[2] | K. Assefa et al., “Genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter],” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 6, no. MAR, pp. 1–13, 2015, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00177. |
[3] | K. Assefa, S. Chanyalew, and Z. Tadele, Tef, Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter, no. January. 2017. doi: 10.1002/9781119130765.ch9. |
[4] | Y. Abebe, A. Bogale, K. M. Hambidge., B. J. Stoecker, K. Bailey, and R. S. Gibson, “Phytate, zinc, iron and calcium content of selected raw and prepared foods consumed in rural Sidama, Southern Ethiopia, and implications for bioavailability,” J. Food Compos. Anal., vol. 20, no. 3–4, pp. 161–168, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2006.09.003. |
[5] | USDA, “National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 27,” USA, 2015. |
[6] | R. Andersen and T. Winge, The Access and Benefit-Sharing Agreement on Teff Genetic Resources. 2012. |
[7] | K. Baye, “Synopsis: Teff: nutrient composition and health benefits,” 2014. |
[8] | L. Spaenij-Dekking, Y. Kooy-Winkelaar, and F. Koning, “The Ethiopian Cereal Tef in Celiac Disease,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 353, no. 16, pp. 1748–1749, 2005, doi: 10.1056/nejmc051492. |
[9] | S. Ferede, K. Assefa, and L. Zemedu, “Tef production, marketing and trade in Ethiopia,” in Principles and Practices of Tef Improvement, D. G. and Z. T. Kebebew Assefa, Solomon Chanyalew, Ed., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) and Agricultural Transformation Institute (ATI), 2022, pp. 449–488. |
[10] | E. Tadele and T. Hibistu, “Spatial production distribution, economic viability and value chain features of teff in Ethiopia: Systematic review,” Cogent Econ. Financ., vol. 10, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1080/23322039.2021.2020484. |
[11] | K. Assefa, J. K. Yu, M. Zeid, G. Belay, H. Tefera, and M. E. Sorrells, “Breeding tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) trotter]: Conventional and molecular approaches,” Plant Breed., vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01782.x. |
[12] | A. Yami, Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]: A valuable Food and Feed Resource. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2016. |
[13] | A. Yami, T. Berhanu, K. Gebremeskel, Seyoum, Bediye, and and A. Tolera, “TEF: AN INVALUABLE LIVESTOCK FEED RESOURCE,” in Principles and Practices of Tef Improvement, A. Kebebew Assefa, Solomon Chanyalew, Dejene Girma and Z. (Eds. Tadele, Eds., Principles and Practices of Tef Improvement: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) and Agricultural Transformation Institute (ATI), 2022, pp. 373–415. |
[14] | W. Kebede et al., “Tef (Eragrostis tef) Variety Development for High Potential Areas of Ethiopia,” Am. J. Biosci. Bioeng., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 23, 2022, doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20221002.11. |
[15] | MoANR, “Plant Variety Release. Protection and Seed quality Control Directorate,” 24, 2018. |
[16] | M. T. Abraha, H. Shimelis, M. Laing, and K. Assefa, “Achievements and gaps in tef productivity improvement practices in the marginal areas of Northern Ethiopia: implications for future research directions,” Int. J. Agric. Sustain., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 42–53, 2017, doi: 10.1080/14735903.2016.1173990. |
[17] | MoA, “Plant Variety Release,” 24, 2021. |
[18] | B. Gemechu, T. Geleta, W. Kebede, S. Chanyalew, K. Assefa, and A. Atilaw, Tef Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter Seed Production Manual. 2021. |
[19] | MoANR, “Agricultural Extension Strategy of Ethiopia Agricultural Extension Strategy of Ethiopia,” pp. 1–59, 2017. |
[20] | K. Emerick and M. H. Dar, “Farmer Field Days and Demonstrator Selection for Increasing Technology Adoption,” Rev. Econ. Stat., vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 680–693, 2021, doi: 10.1162/rest_a_00917. |
[21] | D. B. Yadav, B. R. Kamboj, and R. B. and Garg, “Increasing the productivity and profitability of sunflower through front line demonstrations in irrigated agro-ecosystem of eastern Haryana,” Haryana J. Agron., vol. 20, no. 1/2, p. Haryana Journal of Agronomy 20(1/2): 33-35, 2004. |
[22] | M. R. Bellon, Participatory Research Methods for Technology Evaluation: A Manual for Scientists Working with Farmers. 2001. |
APA Style
Ahmed, M., Mekuriaw, T., Genet, Y., Gudeta, A., Chiche, W., et al. (2024). Pre-Extension Demonstration of Newly Released Tef (Eragrostis tef) Technologies for Selected High Potential Districts of Oromia Region, Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.12
ACS Style
Ahmed, M.; Mekuriaw, T.; Genet, Y.; Gudeta, A.; Chiche, W., et al. Pre-Extension Demonstration of Newly Released Tef (Eragrostis tef) Technologies for Selected High Potential Districts of Oromia Region, Ethiopia. World J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2024, 2(1), 5-10. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.12
AMA Style
Ahmed M, Mekuriaw T, Genet Y, Gudeta A, Chiche W, et al. Pre-Extension Demonstration of Newly Released Tef (Eragrostis tef) Technologies for Selected High Potential Districts of Oromia Region, Ethiopia. World J Agric Sci Technol. 2024;2(1):5-10. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.12
@article{10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.12, author = {Mohammed Ahmed and Truayinet Mekuriaw and Yazachew Genet and Abune Gudeta and Wubshet Chiche and Habtamu Geremew and Tsion Fikre}, title = {Pre-Extension Demonstration of Newly Released Tef (Eragrostis tef) Technologies for Selected High Potential Districts of Oromia Region, Ethiopia}, journal = {World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, pages = {5-10}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjast.20240201.12}, abstract = {Tef (Eragrostis tef) is one of a crucial cereal crop for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia, providing essential food and nutrition security. Nonetheless, the productivity of tef grain is relatively low (1.94 tha-1), resulting from the limited access to improved varieties by farmers and low adoption of recommended management practices. Hence, this activity was conducted to demonstrate and create awareness of improved tef varieties along with their management practices in six selected potential districts namely, Adea, Lume and Gimbichu districts of East Shewa zone, Gelan and Akaki Kality districts of Sheger city administration and Becho districts of South West Shewa zone of Oromia region. Bishoftu, the newly released variety, was demonstrated along with the standard checks (Eba and Dagim) varieties and the farmers practice during the 2022/23 main planting season. Yield data was collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics, while farmers’ preference and feedback were evaluated using direct ranking and narration methods, respectively. The highest grain yield (25.5 qha–1) was obtained from Bishoftu variety at Akaki kality district while the lowest mean grain yield (20.3 qha–1) was recorded from Eba variety at Adea district of East Shewa zones of Oromia region. A mean grain yield increment of 0.2% to 21.6% was recorded from Bishoftu variety over the standard check Eba variety in all the demonstration sites. Similarly, Bishoftu variety was selected first followed by Dagim and Eba varieties in Adea, Gimbichu and Lume districts while Dagim variety was selected first followed by Bishoftu and Eba variety in the Gelan district of Sheger city administration of Oromia region. Therefore, the selected varieties should be scaled up in the target areas and other similar agro-ecological areas by involving all the concerned stakeholders such as the government sectors, non-governmental organizations and other private sectors at different levels. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Pre-Extension Demonstration of Newly Released Tef (Eragrostis tef) Technologies for Selected High Potential Districts of Oromia Region, Ethiopia AU - Mohammed Ahmed AU - Truayinet Mekuriaw AU - Yazachew Genet AU - Abune Gudeta AU - Wubshet Chiche AU - Habtamu Geremew AU - Tsion Fikre Y1 - 2024/01/18 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.12 DO - 10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.12 T2 - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology JF - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology JO - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology SP - 5 EP - 10 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7332 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.12 AB - Tef (Eragrostis tef) is one of a crucial cereal crop for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia, providing essential food and nutrition security. Nonetheless, the productivity of tef grain is relatively low (1.94 tha-1), resulting from the limited access to improved varieties by farmers and low adoption of recommended management practices. Hence, this activity was conducted to demonstrate and create awareness of improved tef varieties along with their management practices in six selected potential districts namely, Adea, Lume and Gimbichu districts of East Shewa zone, Gelan and Akaki Kality districts of Sheger city administration and Becho districts of South West Shewa zone of Oromia region. Bishoftu, the newly released variety, was demonstrated along with the standard checks (Eba and Dagim) varieties and the farmers practice during the 2022/23 main planting season. Yield data was collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics, while farmers’ preference and feedback were evaluated using direct ranking and narration methods, respectively. The highest grain yield (25.5 qha–1) was obtained from Bishoftu variety at Akaki kality district while the lowest mean grain yield (20.3 qha–1) was recorded from Eba variety at Adea district of East Shewa zones of Oromia region. A mean grain yield increment of 0.2% to 21.6% was recorded from Bishoftu variety over the standard check Eba variety in all the demonstration sites. Similarly, Bishoftu variety was selected first followed by Dagim and Eba varieties in Adea, Gimbichu and Lume districts while Dagim variety was selected first followed by Bishoftu and Eba variety in the Gelan district of Sheger city administration of Oromia region. Therefore, the selected varieties should be scaled up in the target areas and other similar agro-ecological areas by involving all the concerned stakeholders such as the government sectors, non-governmental organizations and other private sectors at different levels. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -