The present study was carried out to investigate the interrelationships between some physical and chemical soil characteristics and alfalfa productivity at El-Sadat area, Monufyia Governorate during 2013/2015 years. Eight surface soil samples (0-30 cm) from each location were correlated for the investigated soil indicators determination. The investigated indicators were the coarse sand (CS), fine sand, silt and clay content, bulk density (BD), real density (RD), total porosity (TP), quickly drainable pores (QDP), slowly drainable pores (SDP), water holding capacity (WHC), hydraulic conductivity (HC), field capacity (F. C), wilting coefficient (WC), mean weight diameter (MWD); pH, electric conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM), cation exchange capacity (CEC), calcium carbonate (CaCO3), available potassium (Av-K) and total nitrogen (TN). The highest values of mean standard deviation and the relative weight of physical and chemical indicators were obtained for organic matter represents the important relative weight followed by cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen, clay content, total porosity, field capacity and quickly drainable pores. Concerning the relationship of some soil parameters and alfalfa productivity, the data of correlation studies showed that the most suitable indicators for evaluation of soil quality under different soil management of study area were organic matter, cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen, clay content, total porosity, field capacity and quickly drainable pores.
Published in | Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering (Volume 1, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170102.12 |
Page(s) | 34-40 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Soil Quality, Soil Quality Indicators, Alfalfa Yield
[1] | Andrews, S. S., D. L. Karlen and C. A. Cambardella (2004) The soil management assessment framework: a quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 1945–1962. |
[2] | Aparicio, V. and J. I. Costa (2007) Soil quality indicators under continuous cropping systems in the Argentinean pampas. Soil till Res. 96, 155–165. |
[3] | Doran, J. W. and T. B. Parkin (1994) Defining and Assessing Soil Quality. In: Doran, J. W., Coleman, D. C., Bezdick, D. F., Stewart, B. A. (Eds.), Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am., 35: 3ــ 21. |
[4] | Drury, C. F., T. Q. Zhang and B. D. Kay (2003) the non-limiting and least limiting water range for soil nitrogen mineralization. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 67, 1388-1404. |
[5] | Gomez A. A., D. E. S. Kelly, J. J. Syers and K. J. Coughlan (1996) Measuring sustainability of agricultural systems at farm level. In: Doran J. W. and Jones A. J., Eds. Methods for assessing soil quality. SSSA Special Publication Number 49, Soil Science Society of America, INC., Madison, WI, pp: 401-410. |
[6] | Jaedson, C. A. M., V. O. A. Carlos., G. F. Alcione and R. N. de Assis Junior (2014) Uni and multivariate analyses of soil physical quality indicators of a Cambisol from Apodi Plateau – CE, Brazil. Soil & Tillage Research 140: 66–73. |
[7] | Karlen D. L., J. C. Gardner and M. J. Rosek (1998) A soil quality framework for evaluating the impact of CRP. J. Prod Agric. 11, 56–60. |
[8] | Karlen, D. L. and S. S. Andrews (2004) Soil quality, fertility, and health-Historical context, status and perspectives. pp. 17-33. In Schjønning P et al. (ed.) Managing soil quality: Challenges in modern agriculture. CABI Int. Publ., Oxon, UK. |
[9] | Karlen, D. L., S. S. Andrews., J. W. Doran., B. J. Wienhold (2003) Soil quality: human-kind’s foundation for survival. J. Soil Water Conserv. 58, 171–179. |
[10] | Klute, A. (1986) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd ed.) Amer. Soc. Agron. Monograph No. 9 Madison, Wisconsin, USA. |
[11] | Kock, G. S. and R. F. Link (1971) "Statistical analysis of geological data" Dover publications, Inc. New York. |
[12] | Larson, W. E. and F. J. Pierce (1991) Conservation and enhancement of soil quality. In: Evaluation for Sustainable Land Management in the Developing World (J. Dumanski, Ed.). Proceedings of the International Workshop, Chiang Rai, Thailand, 15-21 Sept. 1991. Technical papers, vol. 2 Int. Board for Soil Res. and Management, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 175-203. |
[13] | Larson, W. E. and F. J. Pierce (1994) Soil quality as a measure of sustainable management, p. 37-52. In J. W. Doran et al. (ed.) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA. Spec. Pub. 35. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI. |
[14] | Liu, Z., W. Zhou, J. Shen, S. Li, G. Liang, X. Wang, J. Sun and C. Al (2013) Soil Quality Assessment of Acid Sulfate Paddy Soils with Different Productivities in Guangdong Province, China, J. Integ. Agric., 13: 177–186. |
[15] | Microsoft Excel (2007) Microsoft Excel. Redmond, Washington. |
[16] | Mohanty M., D. K. Painuli., A. K. Misra and P. K. Ghosh (2007) Soil quality effects of tillage and residue under rice-wheat cropping on a vertisol in India. Soil Till. Res. 92: 243-250. |
[17] | Nishant K. Sinha 1., M. Mohanty, P. M. Bharat., D. Hiranmoy, K. C. Usha and K. S. Anil (2014) Soil quality indicators under continuous cropping systems in the arid ecosystem of India. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 9(2). 285-293. |
[18] | Page, A. I., R. H. Miller and D. R. keeney (1982) Methods of soil Analysis. Part-2 Chemical and Microbiological properties. (2nd ed). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A. |
[19] | Reynolds, W. D., C. F. Drury, C. S. Tan, C. A. Fox. and X. M. Yang (2009) Use of indicators and pore volume function characteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma 1 52: 252 – 263. |
[20] | Saxton, K. E. and W. J. Rawls (2006) Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70: 1569–1578. |
[21] | Shukla, M. K., R. Lal and M. Ebinger (2004) Soil quality indicators for the north a palachian experimental watersheds in Coshocton, Ohio. Soil Science, 169: 195-205. |
[22] | Sigma, plot (2012) Scientific Software Solutions Internationals; sigma plot version 12. |
[23] | Singh, M. J. and K. L. Khera (2009) Physical indicators of soil quality in relation to soil erodibility under different land uses. Arid Land Res Manag. 23, 152-167. |
[24] | Six, J., P. Callewaeort., S. Lenders., S. De Gryze., S. J. Morris., E. G. Gregorich., E. A. Paul and K. Paustian (2002) Measuring and understanding carbon storage in a forested soil by physical fractionation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66: 1981–1987. |
[25] | Somasundaram, J., R. K. Singh., S. Ali., B. K. Sethy., D. Singh., B. L Lakaria., R. S. Chaudhary., R. K. Singh and N. K. Sinha (2013) Soil aggregates and other properties as influenced by different long term lan uses under table landscape topography of Chambal region, Rajasthan, India. 40: 212-217. |
[26] | SPSS (2014) IBM SPSS, Version 21.0, Chicago, USA. |
[27] | Wang, Z., A. C. Chang., L. Wu, and D. Crowley (2003) Assessing the soil quality of long-term reclaimed wastewater-irrigated cropland. Geoderma, 114: 261-278. |
APA Style
Mohamed Soliman Zaid, Ali Mohamed Abd El Wahab Mashhour, Ahmed Hamdy Risk, Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Wanas. (2017). Interrelationships Between Soil Quality Indicators and Alfalfa Productivity for Some Soils of Monufyia Governorate. Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering, 1(2), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170102.12
ACS Style
Mohamed Soliman Zaid; Ali Mohamed Abd El Wahab Mashhour; Ahmed Hamdy Risk; Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Wanas. Interrelationships Between Soil Quality Indicators and Alfalfa Productivity for Some Soils of Monufyia Governorate. J. Chem. Environ. Biol. Eng. 2017, 1(2), 34-40. doi: 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170102.12
AMA Style
Mohamed Soliman Zaid, Ali Mohamed Abd El Wahab Mashhour, Ahmed Hamdy Risk, Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Wanas. Interrelationships Between Soil Quality Indicators and Alfalfa Productivity for Some Soils of Monufyia Governorate. J Chem Environ Biol Eng. 2017;1(2):34-40. doi: 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170102.12
@article{10.11648/j.jcebe.20170102.12, author = {Mohamed Soliman Zaid and Ali Mohamed Abd El Wahab Mashhour and Ahmed Hamdy Risk and Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Wanas}, title = {Interrelationships Between Soil Quality Indicators and Alfalfa Productivity for Some Soils of Monufyia Governorate}, journal = {Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering}, volume = {1}, number = {2}, pages = {34-40}, doi = {10.11648/j.jcebe.20170102.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170102.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jcebe.20170102.12}, abstract = {The present study was carried out to investigate the interrelationships between some physical and chemical soil characteristics and alfalfa productivity at El-Sadat area, Monufyia Governorate during 2013/2015 years. Eight surface soil samples (0-30 cm) from each location were correlated for the investigated soil indicators determination. The investigated indicators were the coarse sand (CS), fine sand, silt and clay content, bulk density (BD), real density (RD), total porosity (TP), quickly drainable pores (QDP), slowly drainable pores (SDP), water holding capacity (WHC), hydraulic conductivity (HC), field capacity (F. C), wilting coefficient (WC), mean weight diameter (MWD); pH, electric conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM), cation exchange capacity (CEC), calcium carbonate (CaCO3), available potassium (Av-K) and total nitrogen (TN). The highest values of mean standard deviation and the relative weight of physical and chemical indicators were obtained for organic matter represents the important relative weight followed by cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen, clay content, total porosity, field capacity and quickly drainable pores. Concerning the relationship of some soil parameters and alfalfa productivity, the data of correlation studies showed that the most suitable indicators for evaluation of soil quality under different soil management of study area were organic matter, cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen, clay content, total porosity, field capacity and quickly drainable pores.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Interrelationships Between Soil Quality Indicators and Alfalfa Productivity for Some Soils of Monufyia Governorate AU - Mohamed Soliman Zaid AU - Ali Mohamed Abd El Wahab Mashhour AU - Ahmed Hamdy Risk AU - Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Wanas Y1 - 2017/08/15 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170102.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170102.12 T2 - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering JF - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering JO - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering SP - 34 EP - 40 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-267X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170102.12 AB - The present study was carried out to investigate the interrelationships between some physical and chemical soil characteristics and alfalfa productivity at El-Sadat area, Monufyia Governorate during 2013/2015 years. Eight surface soil samples (0-30 cm) from each location were correlated for the investigated soil indicators determination. The investigated indicators were the coarse sand (CS), fine sand, silt and clay content, bulk density (BD), real density (RD), total porosity (TP), quickly drainable pores (QDP), slowly drainable pores (SDP), water holding capacity (WHC), hydraulic conductivity (HC), field capacity (F. C), wilting coefficient (WC), mean weight diameter (MWD); pH, electric conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM), cation exchange capacity (CEC), calcium carbonate (CaCO3), available potassium (Av-K) and total nitrogen (TN). The highest values of mean standard deviation and the relative weight of physical and chemical indicators were obtained for organic matter represents the important relative weight followed by cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen, clay content, total porosity, field capacity and quickly drainable pores. Concerning the relationship of some soil parameters and alfalfa productivity, the data of correlation studies showed that the most suitable indicators for evaluation of soil quality under different soil management of study area were organic matter, cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen, clay content, total porosity, field capacity and quickly drainable pores. VL - 1 IS - 2 ER -