In today’s digital era, information flows through multiple channels and a large amount of data becomes available on a daily basis. Government sources, social media, international organisations, and even business corporations use numerical data to communicate with the general public. The recent devastating global pandemic that affected every part of the world is a typical example of this reality. During the pandemic, each government chose a course of decisions and actions that were made based on statistics. International Relations, an interdisciplinary field of study that combines economics, history, and political science to investigate issues such as global poverty, economic growth rates, globalisation, security, and climate change, also employs mathematical formulae and statistical models to produce specific results. Therefore, quantitative methods for research are a key tool available to scholars, researchers, practitioners, and university students of IR. Under this prism, this article focuses on the importance of quantitative methods for triangulation in IR. Quantitative approaches, such as Game Theory and Statistical Analysis, are vital not just as independent research methodologies, but also as important components of qualitative research in IR. The main argument of this paper is that the choice between qualitative-quantitative research remains vivid among IR scholars. Nonetheless, this appears to be a case of synergy rather than antagonism between the two. Under this scope, this work shall highlight the relevance of quantitative approaches for triangulation in IR qualitative research, providing examples of certain research cases.
Published in | Journal of Political Science and International Relations (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jpsir.20220502.12 |
Page(s) | 37-44 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
International Relations, Quantitative, Qualitative, Triangulation
[1] | Barkin, S. (2008) ‘Qualitative Methods?’, in Klotz, A. & Parkash, D. (eds) Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. London: Palgrave Macmillan. |
[2] | Cornell University (2019) Game Theory in the Cold War. online. https://blogs.cornell.edu/info2040/2019/09/18/game-theory-in-the-cold-war/. (Accessed: 05/19/2021). |
[3] | Curini, L. & Franzese, R. (2020) Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations. London: Sage Publications. |
[4] | Devin, G. (2018) Resources and Applied Methods in International Relations. Paris: Palgrave Macmillan. |
[5] | Dunn, K. C. (2008) ‘Historical Representation’, in Klotz, A. & Prakash, D. (eds) Qualitative Methods in International Relations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. |
[6] | Duşa, A. (2020) ‘Set Theoretic Methods’, in Curini, L. & Franzese, R. (eds) Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations. Vol 2. London: Sage Publications. |
[7] | European Parliament (2020) ‘Redistribution of seats in the European Parliament after Brexit’, European Parliament. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20200130IPR71407/redistribution-of-seats-in-the-european-parliament-after-brexit (Accessed: 03/17/22). |
[8] | European Parliament (2022) ‘Flash Eurobarometer: Women in times of COVID-19’, European Parliament. Available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/api/deliverable/download/file?deliverableId=80615 (Accessed: 03/28/2022). |
[9] | Frost, J. (2020) Introduction to Statistics: An Intuitive Guide for Analyzing Data and Unlocking Discoveries. Pennsylvania: Statistics by Jim Publishing. |
[10] | Greenstein, C. & Mosley, L. (2020) ‘When Talk isn’t Cheap: Opportunities and Challenges in Interview Research’, in Curini, L. & Franzese, R. (eds) Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations. Vol 2. London: Sage Publications. |
[11] | Heath, L. (2015) ‘Triangulation: Methodology’, in Wright, J. D. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. |
[12] | Hoffmann, M. J. (2008) ‘Agent-based Modeling’, in Klotz, A. & Parkash, D. (eds) Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. London: Palgrave Macmillan. |
[13] | Klotz, A. & Lynch, C. M. (2007) Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. Oxon: Routledge. |
[14] | Lamont, C. (2022) Research Methods in International Relations. 2nd edn. London: Sage. |
[15] | Lamont, C. & Boduszyński, M. P. (2020) Research Methods in Politics and International Relations. London: Sage Publications. |
[16] | Levin, J., Fox, J. A., & Forde, D. R. (2017) Elementary Statistics in Social Research. 12th edn. New York, NY: Pearson Education, Inc. |
[17] | Lund, T. (2012) ‘Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Some Arguments for Mixed Methods Research’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56 (2), pp. 155-165. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2011.568674. |
[18] | Morgan (2017) Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. London: Sage Publications. |
[19] | Morrow, J. D. & Sun, J. S. (2020) ‘Models of Interstate Conflict’, in Curini, L. & Franzese, R. (eds) Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations. Vol 1. London: Sage Publications. |
[20] | Ndanu, M. C. & Syombua, M. J. (2015) ‘Mixed Methods Research: The Hidden Cracks of the Triangulation Design’, General Education Journal, 4 (2), pp. 46-67. |
[21] | Nightingale, A. J. (2020) ‘Triangulation’, in Kobayashi, A. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. |
[22] | Olsen, W. (2004) ‘Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods can really be Mixed’, in Holborn, M. (ed.) Developments in Sociology. Vol 20. London: MacMillan. |
[23] | Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002) ‘Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research’, Quality & Quantity, 36, pp. 43-53. |
[24] | Slattery, E. L., Voelker, C. C. J., Nussenbaum, B., Rich, J. T., Paniello, R. C., & Neely, J. G. (2011) ‘A Practical Guide to Surveys and Questionnaires’, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 144 (6), pp. 831-837. doi: 10.1177/0194599811399724. |
[25] | Snidal, D. (1985) ‘The Game Theory of International Politics’, in Oye, K. A. (ed) Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. |
[26] | Stockemer, D. (2019) Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. |
[27] | Stone R. W. (2001) ‘The Use and Abuse of Game Theory in International Relations: The Theory of Moves’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45 (2), pp. 216-244. doi: 10.1177/0022002701045002004. |
[28] | Williams, H. M. (2020) Statistics for Politics and International Relations Using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: Sage Publications Ltd. |
APA Style
Evanthia Balla, George Dimitropoulos. (2022). Introduction to Quantitative Approaches for Triangulation in International Relations: A Basic Guide. Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 5(2), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20220502.12
ACS Style
Evanthia Balla; George Dimitropoulos. Introduction to Quantitative Approaches for Triangulation in International Relations: A Basic Guide. J. Polit. Sci. Int. Relat. 2022, 5(2), 37-44. doi: 10.11648/j.jpsir.20220502.12
@article{10.11648/j.jpsir.20220502.12, author = {Evanthia Balla and George Dimitropoulos}, title = {Introduction to Quantitative Approaches for Triangulation in International Relations: A Basic Guide}, journal = {Journal of Political Science and International Relations}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {37-44}, doi = {10.11648/j.jpsir.20220502.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20220502.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jpsir.20220502.12}, abstract = {In today’s digital era, information flows through multiple channels and a large amount of data becomes available on a daily basis. Government sources, social media, international organisations, and even business corporations use numerical data to communicate with the general public. The recent devastating global pandemic that affected every part of the world is a typical example of this reality. During the pandemic, each government chose a course of decisions and actions that were made based on statistics. International Relations, an interdisciplinary field of study that combines economics, history, and political science to investigate issues such as global poverty, economic growth rates, globalisation, security, and climate change, also employs mathematical formulae and statistical models to produce specific results. Therefore, quantitative methods for research are a key tool available to scholars, researchers, practitioners, and university students of IR. Under this prism, this article focuses on the importance of quantitative methods for triangulation in IR. Quantitative approaches, such as Game Theory and Statistical Analysis, are vital not just as independent research methodologies, but also as important components of qualitative research in IR. The main argument of this paper is that the choice between qualitative-quantitative research remains vivid among IR scholars. Nonetheless, this appears to be a case of synergy rather than antagonism between the two. Under this scope, this work shall highlight the relevance of quantitative approaches for triangulation in IR qualitative research, providing examples of certain research cases.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Introduction to Quantitative Approaches for Triangulation in International Relations: A Basic Guide AU - Evanthia Balla AU - George Dimitropoulos Y1 - 2022/04/26 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20220502.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jpsir.20220502.12 T2 - Journal of Political Science and International Relations JF - Journal of Political Science and International Relations JO - Journal of Political Science and International Relations SP - 37 EP - 44 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2785 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20220502.12 AB - In today’s digital era, information flows through multiple channels and a large amount of data becomes available on a daily basis. Government sources, social media, international organisations, and even business corporations use numerical data to communicate with the general public. The recent devastating global pandemic that affected every part of the world is a typical example of this reality. During the pandemic, each government chose a course of decisions and actions that were made based on statistics. International Relations, an interdisciplinary field of study that combines economics, history, and political science to investigate issues such as global poverty, economic growth rates, globalisation, security, and climate change, also employs mathematical formulae and statistical models to produce specific results. Therefore, quantitative methods for research are a key tool available to scholars, researchers, practitioners, and university students of IR. Under this prism, this article focuses on the importance of quantitative methods for triangulation in IR. Quantitative approaches, such as Game Theory and Statistical Analysis, are vital not just as independent research methodologies, but also as important components of qualitative research in IR. The main argument of this paper is that the choice between qualitative-quantitative research remains vivid among IR scholars. Nonetheless, this appears to be a case of synergy rather than antagonism between the two. Under this scope, this work shall highlight the relevance of quantitative approaches for triangulation in IR qualitative research, providing examples of certain research cases. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -