This article derives from a monograph that investigated the factors affecting the incorrect writing of simple sentence structures by 12th-grade day-shift students at Nampula Secondary School. The overall aim was to identify the factors that lead students to write simple sentences incorrectly in English. Eighty-seven subjects took part in this descriptive, single-site study, namely 85 students (45 male and 40 female) from four 12th-grade classes and 2 English teachers. A pragmatic paradigm and a mixed-methods approach were adopted, using a written test, semi-structured interviews and lesson observation as data-collection instruments. Performance on the written test was weak and declined with structural complexity: 42.4% of students produced correct declarative sentences, versus 24.7% for negative declaratives, 20.0% for interrogatives and 10.6% for negative interrogatives. Interviews and classroom observation indicated infrequent explicit teaching of simple-sentence structure (5.5% of coded intervals) relative to unsystematic error correction (55.5%). These patterns are associated with, and are interpreted here in relation to, limited grammatical instruction, limited exposure to English outside the classroom, and low reported motivation, in a context where teachers reported not addressing the topic systematically despite its inclusion in the 12th-grade syllabus. Because the design is descriptive and confined to a single school, these associations should not be read as established causes. Controlled and free-practice activities for teaching simple-sentence structure are proposed, together with greater student exposure to English inside and outside the classroom and continuous teacher training, as directions warranting further, more rigorous research.
| Published in | Science Futures (Volume 2, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15 |
| Page(s) | 284-291 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Simple Sentence Structure, Factors, Incorrect Writing, English Language Teaching, Mozambique
| [1] | Aarts, B. English Syntax and Argumentation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2001. |
| [2] | Devine, F. P. Good-Proof Grammar. New York, NY: Learning Express; 2002. |
| [3] | Wekker, H., Haegeman, L. A Modern Course in English Syntax. London, UK: Routledge; 1996. |
| [4] | Burton-Roberts, N. Analysing Sentences. 3rd ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2011. |
| [5] | Tallerman, M. Understanding Syntax. 3rd ed. London, UK: Hodder Education; 2011. |
| [6] | Harmer, J. How to Teach English: An Introduction to the Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow, UK: Longman; 2001. |
| [7] | Harmer, J. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New ed. Harlow, UK: Longman; 1991. |
| [8] | Ellis, R. Learning a Second Language Through Interaction. London, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 1985. |
| [9] | Brown, H. D. Teaching by Principles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1994. |
| [10] | Stern, H. H. Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1993. |
| [11] |
British Council. Exposure: Teaching English. Available from:
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/exposure (accessed 12 September 2026). |
| [12] | Ndamba, GT. Mother Tongue Usage in Learning: An Examination of Language Preferences in Zimbabwe. The Journal of Pan African Studies 2008 2: 4. |
| [13] | Yule, G. Pragmatics. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996. |
| [14] | Richards, J. C. Key Issues in Language Teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2015. |
| [15] | Nation, I. S. P., Newton, J. Teaching ESL/EFL Listening and Speaking. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2020. |
| [16] | Harmer, J. The Practice of English Language Teaching. 5th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education; 2015. |
| [17] | Jarvis, S., Pavlenko, A. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York, NY: Routledge; 2008. |
| [18] | Cook, V. Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. 5th ed. London, UK: Routledge; 2016. |
| [19] | Ellis, R. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2015. |
| [20] | Sundqvist, P., Sylvén, L. K. Extramural English in Teaching and Learning: From Theory and Research to Practice. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. |
| [21] | Al-Zoubi, S. M. The Impact of Exposure to English Language on Language Acquisition. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research. 2018, 5(4), 151–162. |
| [22] | Maxom, M. Teaching English as a Foreign Language for Dummies. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2009. |
| [23] | Doff, A. Teach English: A Training Course for Teachers – Trainer's Handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1988. |
| [24] | Harmer, J. The Practice of English Language Teaching. 4th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman; 2007. |
| [25] | Freeman, D. L. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000. |
| [26] | Kothari, C. R. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. 3rd ed. New Delhi, India: New Age International; 2004. |
| [27] | Miller, J. An Introduction to English Syntax. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press; 2002. |
| [28] | Mohamed, A. Grammatical Accuracy and Meaning in Written English. Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2002, 15(2), 123–145. |
| [29] | Magno, C., et al. Assessing the Level of English Language Exposure of Taiwanese College Students in Taiwan and the Philippines. Asian EFL Journal. 2009. |
| [30] | Morgan, D. L. Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007, 1(1), 48–76. |
APA Style
Mpenda, C. (2026). Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School. Science Futures, 2(5), 284-291. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15
ACS Style
Mpenda, C. Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School. Sci. Futures 2026, 2(5), 284-291. doi: 10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15
AMA Style
Mpenda C. Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School. Sci Futures. 2026;2(5):284-291. doi: 10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15
@article{10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15,
author = {Chibalonza Mpenda},
title = {Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School},
journal = {Science Futures},
volume = {2},
number = {5},
pages = {284-291},
doi = {10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.scif.20260205.15},
abstract = {This article derives from a monograph that investigated the factors affecting the incorrect writing of simple sentence structures by 12th-grade day-shift students at Nampula Secondary School. The overall aim was to identify the factors that lead students to write simple sentences incorrectly in English. Eighty-seven subjects took part in this descriptive, single-site study, namely 85 students (45 male and 40 female) from four 12th-grade classes and 2 English teachers. A pragmatic paradigm and a mixed-methods approach were adopted, using a written test, semi-structured interviews and lesson observation as data-collection instruments. Performance on the written test was weak and declined with structural complexity: 42.4% of students produced correct declarative sentences, versus 24.7% for negative declaratives, 20.0% for interrogatives and 10.6% for negative interrogatives. Interviews and classroom observation indicated infrequent explicit teaching of simple-sentence structure (5.5% of coded intervals) relative to unsystematic error correction (55.5%). These patterns are associated with, and are interpreted here in relation to, limited grammatical instruction, limited exposure to English outside the classroom, and low reported motivation, in a context where teachers reported not addressing the topic systematically despite its inclusion in the 12th-grade syllabus. Because the design is descriptive and confined to a single school, these associations should not be read as established causes. Controlled and free-practice activities for teaching simple-sentence structure are proposed, together with greater student exposure to English inside and outside the classroom and continuous teacher training, as directions warranting further, more rigorous research.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School AU - Chibalonza Mpenda Y1 - 2026/09/29 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15 DO - 10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15 T2 - Science Futures JF - Science Futures JO - Science Futures SP - 284 EP - 291 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 3070-6289 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15 AB - This article derives from a monograph that investigated the factors affecting the incorrect writing of simple sentence structures by 12th-grade day-shift students at Nampula Secondary School. The overall aim was to identify the factors that lead students to write simple sentences incorrectly in English. Eighty-seven subjects took part in this descriptive, single-site study, namely 85 students (45 male and 40 female) from four 12th-grade classes and 2 English teachers. A pragmatic paradigm and a mixed-methods approach were adopted, using a written test, semi-structured interviews and lesson observation as data-collection instruments. Performance on the written test was weak and declined with structural complexity: 42.4% of students produced correct declarative sentences, versus 24.7% for negative declaratives, 20.0% for interrogatives and 10.6% for negative interrogatives. Interviews and classroom observation indicated infrequent explicit teaching of simple-sentence structure (5.5% of coded intervals) relative to unsystematic error correction (55.5%). These patterns are associated with, and are interpreted here in relation to, limited grammatical instruction, limited exposure to English outside the classroom, and low reported motivation, in a context where teachers reported not addressing the topic systematically despite its inclusion in the 12th-grade syllabus. Because the design is descriptive and confined to a single school, these associations should not be read as established causes. Controlled and free-practice activities for teaching simple-sentence structure are proposed, together with greater student exposure to English inside and outside the classroom and continuous teacher training, as directions warranting further, more rigorous research. VL - 2 IS - 5 ER -