Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School

Received: 4 September 2026     Accepted: 15 September 2026     Published: 29 September 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This article derives from a monograph that investigated the factors affecting the incorrect writing of simple sentence structures by 12th-grade day-shift students at Nampula Secondary School. The overall aim was to identify the factors that lead students to write simple sentences incorrectly in English. Eighty-seven subjects took part in this descriptive, single-site study, namely 85 students (45 male and 40 female) from four 12th-grade classes and 2 English teachers. A pragmatic paradigm and a mixed-methods approach were adopted, using a written test, semi-structured interviews and lesson observation as data-collection instruments. Performance on the written test was weak and declined with structural complexity: 42.4% of students produced correct declarative sentences, versus 24.7% for negative declaratives, 20.0% for interrogatives and 10.6% for negative interrogatives. Interviews and classroom observation indicated infrequent explicit teaching of simple-sentence structure (5.5% of coded intervals) relative to unsystematic error correction (55.5%). These patterns are associated with, and are interpreted here in relation to, limited grammatical instruction, limited exposure to English outside the classroom, and low reported motivation, in a context where teachers reported not addressing the topic systematically despite its inclusion in the 12th-grade syllabus. Because the design is descriptive and confined to a single school, these associations should not be read as established causes. Controlled and free-practice activities for teaching simple-sentence structure are proposed, together with greater student exposure to English inside and outside the classroom and continuous teacher training, as directions warranting further, more rigorous research.

Published in Science Futures (Volume 2, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15
Page(s) 284-291
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Simple Sentence Structure, Factors, Incorrect Writing, English Language Teaching, Mozambique

References
[1] Aarts, B. English Syntax and Argumentation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2001.
[2] Devine, F. P. Good-Proof Grammar. New York, NY: Learning Express; 2002.
[3] Wekker, H., Haegeman, L. A Modern Course in English Syntax. London, UK: Routledge; 1996.
[4] Burton-Roberts, N. Analysing Sentences. 3rd ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2011.
[5] Tallerman, M. Understanding Syntax. 3rd ed. London, UK: Hodder Education; 2011.
[6] Harmer, J. How to Teach English: An Introduction to the Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow, UK: Longman; 2001.
[7] Harmer, J. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New ed. Harlow, UK: Longman; 1991.
[8] Ellis, R. Learning a Second Language Through Interaction. London, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 1985.
[9] Brown, H. D. Teaching by Principles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1994.
[10] Stern, H. H. Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1993.
[11] British Council. Exposure: Teaching English. Available from:
[12] Ndamba, GT. Mother Tongue Usage in Learning: An Examination of Language Preferences in Zimbabwe. The Journal of Pan African Studies 2008 2: 4.
[13] Yule, G. Pragmatics. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
[14] Richards, J. C. Key Issues in Language Teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
[15] Nation, I. S. P., Newton, J. Teaching ESL/EFL Listening and Speaking. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2020.
[16] Harmer, J. The Practice of English Language Teaching. 5th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education; 2015.
[17] Jarvis, S., Pavlenko, A. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York, NY: Routledge; 2008.
[18] Cook, V. Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. 5th ed. London, UK: Routledge; 2016.
[19] Ellis, R. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2015.
[20] Sundqvist, P., Sylvén, L. K. Extramural English in Teaching and Learning: From Theory and Research to Practice. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016.
[21] Al-Zoubi, S. M. The Impact of Exposure to English Language on Language Acquisition. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research. 2018, 5(4), 151–162.
[22] Maxom, M. Teaching English as a Foreign Language for Dummies. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2009.
[23] Doff, A. Teach English: A Training Course for Teachers – Trainer's Handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
[24] Harmer, J. The Practice of English Language Teaching. 4th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman; 2007.
[25] Freeman, D. L. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000.
[26] Kothari, C. R. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. 3rd ed. New Delhi, India: New Age International; 2004.
[27] Miller, J. An Introduction to English Syntax. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press; 2002.
[28] Mohamed, A. Grammatical Accuracy and Meaning in Written English. Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2002, 15(2), 123–145.
[29] Magno, C., et al. Assessing the Level of English Language Exposure of Taiwanese College Students in Taiwan and the Philippines. Asian EFL Journal. 2009.
[30] Morgan, D. L. Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007, 1(1), 48–76.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mpenda, C. (2026). Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School. Science Futures, 2(5), 284-291. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mpenda, C. Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School. Sci. Futures 2026, 2(5), 284-291. doi: 10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mpenda C. Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School. Sci Futures. 2026;2(5):284-291. doi: 10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15,
      author = {Chibalonza Mpenda},
      title = {Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School},
      journal = {Science Futures},
      volume = {2},
      number = {5},
      pages = {284-291},
      doi = {10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.scif.20260205.15},
      abstract = {This article derives from a monograph that investigated the factors affecting the incorrect writing of simple sentence structures by 12th-grade day-shift students at Nampula Secondary School. The overall aim was to identify the factors that lead students to write simple sentences incorrectly in English. Eighty-seven subjects took part in this descriptive, single-site study, namely 85 students (45 male and 40 female) from four 12th-grade classes and 2 English teachers. A pragmatic paradigm and a mixed-methods approach were adopted, using a written test, semi-structured interviews and lesson observation as data-collection instruments. Performance on the written test was weak and declined with structural complexity: 42.4% of students produced correct declarative sentences, versus 24.7% for negative declaratives, 20.0% for interrogatives and 10.6% for negative interrogatives. Interviews and classroom observation indicated infrequent explicit teaching of simple-sentence structure (5.5% of coded intervals) relative to unsystematic error correction (55.5%). These patterns are associated with, and are interpreted here in relation to, limited grammatical instruction, limited exposure to English outside the classroom, and low reported motivation, in a context where teachers reported not addressing the topic systematically despite its inclusion in the 12th-grade syllabus. Because the design is descriptive and confined to a single school, these associations should not be read as established causes. Controlled and free-practice activities for teaching simple-sentence structure are proposed, together with greater student exposure to English inside and outside the classroom and continuous teacher training, as directions warranting further, more rigorous research.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Factors Associated with Errors in English Simple-Sentence Writing: A Case Study of Grade 12 Students at Nampula Secondary School
    AU  - Chibalonza Mpenda
    Y1  - 2026/09/29
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15
    T2  - Science Futures
    JF  - Science Futures
    JO  - Science Futures
    SP  - 284
    EP  - 291
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 3070-6289
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260205.15
    AB  - This article derives from a monograph that investigated the factors affecting the incorrect writing of simple sentence structures by 12th-grade day-shift students at Nampula Secondary School. The overall aim was to identify the factors that lead students to write simple sentences incorrectly in English. Eighty-seven subjects took part in this descriptive, single-site study, namely 85 students (45 male and 40 female) from four 12th-grade classes and 2 English teachers. A pragmatic paradigm and a mixed-methods approach were adopted, using a written test, semi-structured interviews and lesson observation as data-collection instruments. Performance on the written test was weak and declined with structural complexity: 42.4% of students produced correct declarative sentences, versus 24.7% for negative declaratives, 20.0% for interrogatives and 10.6% for negative interrogatives. Interviews and classroom observation indicated infrequent explicit teaching of simple-sentence structure (5.5% of coded intervals) relative to unsystematic error correction (55.5%). These patterns are associated with, and are interpreted here in relation to, limited grammatical instruction, limited exposure to English outside the classroom, and low reported motivation, in a context where teachers reported not addressing the topic systematically despite its inclusion in the 12th-grade syllabus. Because the design is descriptive and confined to a single school, these associations should not be read as established causes. Controlled and free-practice activities for teaching simple-sentence structure are proposed, together with greater student exposure to English inside and outside the classroom and continuous teacher training, as directions warranting further, more rigorous research.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections