Presently work describes a new method for melanoidins removal encountered in yeast industry effluents. Three different kinds of carbon sources were inmobilized in alginate beads and include rubber tire pyrolysis, activated carbon and multiwalled nanotubes. The yeast effluent was obtained through aerobic fermentation with 40 g/L of molasses. The effluent was separated through filtration. The alginate beads consisted in 3 g of alginate and 4 g of the carbon sources, which were dissolved in one liter of distilled water. The last was added drop by drop into a solution of CaCl2 (15 g/L). The alginate beads were used in different proportions (w/v) in the effluent (1:6, 1:3.5, 1:2.6 and 1:1). The melanoidins amount adsorbed was determined through a spectrophotometer UV vis (600 nm). At 1:1, the concentration of melanoidins at the equilibrium (qe) for rubber pyrolysis was 3.5 mg/g, for the activated carbon was 5.0 mg/g, for multiwalled nanotubes qe was 5.3 mg/g and when the alginate beads probed alone qe was only 1.5 mg/g. In order to predict the adsorption capacity in a continuous stirred tank we assessed the saturation constant (Ks) in the batch treatments. The continuous fermenter was simulated from 0.01 to 1.0 h-1 dilution rates. At the lowest proportion (w/v) 1:6 the maximum sorbtion capacity was at 0.427 g/L.h obtained with the rubber pyrolysis at 0.26 h-1. When we used a proportions (w/v) of 1:3.5, 1:2.6 and 1:1, the maximum adsorption capacity were 0.77, 1.04 and 1.13 g/L.h, respectively and these values were obtained with multiwalled nanotubes.
Published in | Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.13 |
Page(s) | 14-21 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Carbon Sources, Alginate Beads, Melanoidins, Removal, Continuous Treatment, Batch Treatment, Simulations
[1] | Zub S., Kurissoo T., Manert A., Blonkaja V., (2008). Combined biological treatment of high sulphate wastewater from yeast production. Water and Environmental Journal. 22, 274-286. |
[2] | Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, H., Wu, Z. (2009). Variables affecting melanoidin containing wastewater by coagulation/flocculation. Separation and Purification Technology 68 (3): 382-389. |
[3] | Kalyuzhnyi S., Gladchenko M., Starostina E., Shcherbakov S., Versprille A., (2005). Combined biological and physico-chemical treatment of baker's yeast wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 52, 175–181. |
[4] | Gengec E., Kobya M., Demirbas E., Akyol A., Oktor K. (2012). Optimization of baker's yeast wastewater using response surface methodology by electrocoagulation. Desalination, 286, 200–209. |
[5] | Wedzicha B. L., Kaputo M. T., (1992). Melanoidins from glucose and glycine: composition, characteristics and reactivity towards sulphite ion. Food Chemistry, 43, 359–367. |
[6] | Braccini, I., Grasso, R. P. and Perez S. (1999). Alginate uses: a review. Carbohidrate Research, 317: 119-130. |
[7] | Wojtowick, M. A., & Serio M. A. (1996). Pyrolysis of scrap tires: Can it be profitable? Chemtech, 48-54. |
[8] | Liakos, T. I., & Lazaridis, N. K. (2016). Melanoidin removal from molasses effluents by adsorption. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 10: 156-164. |
[9] | Ho, Y. S., & McKay, G. (1999). Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochemistry, 34: 451-465. |
[10] | Ojijo, V. O., Onyango, M. S., Ochieng, A., Otieno F. A. O. (2010). Decolourization of Melanoidin Containing Wastewater Using South African Coal Fly Ash. International Journal of Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, 4 (1): 58-64. |
[11] | Figaro, S., Avril, J., Brouers, F., Ouensanga, A., Gaspard, S. (2009). Adsorption studies of molasse`s wastewaters on activated carbon: modeling with a new fractal kinetic equation and evaluation of kinetic models. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161: 649-656. |
[12] | Dunn, I. J., Heinzle, E., Inham, J. Bioreaction Engineering Principles. Biological Reaction Engineering: Dynamic Modeling Fundamentals with Simulation Examples. 2th Ed. Wiley-VCH & kGaA, Weinheim. 2011. |
[13] | Onyango, M. S., Kittinya, J., Hadebe, N, Ojijo, V. O., Ochieng, A. (2011). Sorption of melanoidin onto surfactant modified zeolite. CI&CEQ 17 (4): 385−395. |
[14] | Satyawali, Y., & Balakrishnan M. (2007). Removal of color from biomethanated distillery spentwash by treatment with activated carbons. Bioresource Technology, 98: 2629-2635. |
[15] | Venkat, S. M., Krishna, S. M., Karthikeyan, J. (2000). Adsorption mechanism of the acid-azo dye from aqueous solution on to coal based sorbents and activated carbon. Analytical techniques in monitoring the Environment. Tiruphathi, India, pp. 97-103. |
APA Style
César Reyes-Reyes, Hebert Jair Barrales-Cureño, Petra Andrade-Hoyos, Rocío Fuentes-Galvan, Fernando Michel Zamora-Espinoza, et al. (2017). Immobilizing Different Carbon Sources in Alginate Beads for Melanoidins Removal from Yeast Effluents. Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering, 1(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.13
ACS Style
César Reyes-Reyes; Hebert Jair Barrales-Cureño; Petra Andrade-Hoyos; Rocío Fuentes-Galvan; Fernando Michel Zamora-Espinoza, et al. Immobilizing Different Carbon Sources in Alginate Beads for Melanoidins Removal from Yeast Effluents. J. Chem. Environ. Biol. Eng. 2017, 1(1), 14-21. doi: 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.13
AMA Style
César Reyes-Reyes, Hebert Jair Barrales-Cureño, Petra Andrade-Hoyos, Rocío Fuentes-Galvan, Fernando Michel Zamora-Espinoza, et al. Immobilizing Different Carbon Sources in Alginate Beads for Melanoidins Removal from Yeast Effluents. J Chem Environ Biol Eng. 2017;1(1):14-21. doi: 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.13
@article{10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.13, author = {César Reyes-Reyes and Hebert Jair Barrales-Cureño and Petra Andrade-Hoyos and Rocío Fuentes-Galvan and Fernando Michel Zamora-Espinoza and Omar Alberto Hernández-Aguirre and Ketzasmin Armando Terrón-Mejía and Juan Antonio Cortes-Ruíz and Jordi Orlando González Osuna and Luis Germán López-Valdez and Salvador Chávez-Salinas}, title = {Immobilizing Different Carbon Sources in Alginate Beads for Melanoidins Removal from Yeast Effluents}, journal = {Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {14-21}, doi = {10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jcebe.20170101.13}, abstract = {Presently work describes a new method for melanoidins removal encountered in yeast industry effluents. Three different kinds of carbon sources were inmobilized in alginate beads and include rubber tire pyrolysis, activated carbon and multiwalled nanotubes. The yeast effluent was obtained through aerobic fermentation with 40 g/L of molasses. The effluent was separated through filtration. The alginate beads consisted in 3 g of alginate and 4 g of the carbon sources, which were dissolved in one liter of distilled water. The last was added drop by drop into a solution of CaCl2 (15 g/L). The alginate beads were used in different proportions (w/v) in the effluent (1:6, 1:3.5, 1:2.6 and 1:1). The melanoidins amount adsorbed was determined through a spectrophotometer UV vis (600 nm). At 1:1, the concentration of melanoidins at the equilibrium (qe) for rubber pyrolysis was 3.5 mg/g, for the activated carbon was 5.0 mg/g, for multiwalled nanotubes qe was 5.3 mg/g and when the alginate beads probed alone qe was only 1.5 mg/g. In order to predict the adsorption capacity in a continuous stirred tank we assessed the saturation constant (Ks) in the batch treatments. The continuous fermenter was simulated from 0.01 to 1.0 h-1 dilution rates. At the lowest proportion (w/v) 1:6 the maximum sorbtion capacity was at 0.427 g/L.h obtained with the rubber pyrolysis at 0.26 h-1. When we used a proportions (w/v) of 1:3.5, 1:2.6 and 1:1, the maximum adsorption capacity were 0.77, 1.04 and 1.13 g/L.h, respectively and these values were obtained with multiwalled nanotubes.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Immobilizing Different Carbon Sources in Alginate Beads for Melanoidins Removal from Yeast Effluents AU - César Reyes-Reyes AU - Hebert Jair Barrales-Cureño AU - Petra Andrade-Hoyos AU - Rocío Fuentes-Galvan AU - Fernando Michel Zamora-Espinoza AU - Omar Alberto Hernández-Aguirre AU - Ketzasmin Armando Terrón-Mejía AU - Juan Antonio Cortes-Ruíz AU - Jordi Orlando González Osuna AU - Luis Germán López-Valdez AU - Salvador Chávez-Salinas Y1 - 2017/03/22 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.13 T2 - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering JF - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering JO - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering SP - 14 EP - 21 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-267X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.13 AB - Presently work describes a new method for melanoidins removal encountered in yeast industry effluents. Three different kinds of carbon sources were inmobilized in alginate beads and include rubber tire pyrolysis, activated carbon and multiwalled nanotubes. The yeast effluent was obtained through aerobic fermentation with 40 g/L of molasses. The effluent was separated through filtration. The alginate beads consisted in 3 g of alginate and 4 g of the carbon sources, which were dissolved in one liter of distilled water. The last was added drop by drop into a solution of CaCl2 (15 g/L). The alginate beads were used in different proportions (w/v) in the effluent (1:6, 1:3.5, 1:2.6 and 1:1). The melanoidins amount adsorbed was determined through a spectrophotometer UV vis (600 nm). At 1:1, the concentration of melanoidins at the equilibrium (qe) for rubber pyrolysis was 3.5 mg/g, for the activated carbon was 5.0 mg/g, for multiwalled nanotubes qe was 5.3 mg/g and when the alginate beads probed alone qe was only 1.5 mg/g. In order to predict the adsorption capacity in a continuous stirred tank we assessed the saturation constant (Ks) in the batch treatments. The continuous fermenter was simulated from 0.01 to 1.0 h-1 dilution rates. At the lowest proportion (w/v) 1:6 the maximum sorbtion capacity was at 0.427 g/L.h obtained with the rubber pyrolysis at 0.26 h-1. When we used a proportions (w/v) of 1:3.5, 1:2.6 and 1:1, the maximum adsorption capacity were 0.77, 1.04 and 1.13 g/L.h, respectively and these values were obtained with multiwalled nanotubes. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -