| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Ripe and Unripe Pawpaw Seeds Powder in the Control of Callosobruchus maculatus in Stored Cowpea

Received: 2 June 2017     Accepted: 19 June 2017     Published: 21 July 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

As alternative to the use of these synthetic insecticides, plant extracts, powders and ash have been used as cheaper and eco-friendly means of controlling C. maculatus infestation of stored cowpea seeds. This study was carried out to investigate the contact toxicity of ripe and unripe pawpaw seeds powder, both at concentration of 0.2g, 0.4g, 0.6g, 0.8g, and 1.0g per 20g of cowpea seeds. The plant powders were effective in controlling the population of C. maculatus at 48 hours of treatment across the treatment concentrations, the unripe pawpaw seeds powder were more effective at the treatment rate of 1.0g in the mortality rate. However, their effectiveness was dependent on dosage rate and period of application. The high mortality rate, reduction in the number of eggs laid, low adult emergence and low seed weight loss achieved by the effects of plant powders on the beetles was directly proportional to the increase in their application rates. The effective control of the activities of C. maculatus in seeds treated with ripe and unripe pawpaw seeds powder may have been due to their toxicity effects.

Published in Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering (Volume 1, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.14
Page(s) 22-26
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Evaluation, Ripe and Unripe Pawpaw Seeds, Callosobruchus maculatus, Cowpea

References
[1] Abebe, G., Hattar, B., At-tawah, A. (2005). Nutrient Availability as Affected by Manure Application to Cowpea (VignaUnguiculata L. Walp.) on Calacarious Soils. Journal of Agric. Soc. Sci., 1: 1-6.
[2] Adeyemi, S. A., Lewu, F. B., Adebola, P. O., Bradley, G. and Okoh, A. I. (2012). Protein Content Variation in Cowpea Genotypes (Vigna UnguiculataL. Walp.) Grown in The Eastern Cape Province of South Africa as Affected by Mineralised Goat Manure. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7 (35): 4943-4947.
[3] Baidoo, P. K., Mochiah, M. B. and Owusu–Akyaw, M. (2010). The Effect of Time of Harvest on the Damage Caused by the Cowpea Weevil Callosobruchusmaculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) Journal of Stored Products and Postharvest Research, 1 (3): 24 28.
[4] Berger, M. M., (2005). Can oxidative damage be treated nutritionally? Cl. Nutr. 24, 172–183.
[5] Brisibe, E. A., Adugbo, S. E., Ekanem, U., Brisibe, F. and Figueira, G. M. (2011). Controlling Bruchid Pests of Stored Cowpea Seeds with Dried Leaves of Artemisia annuaand Two Other Common Botanicals. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10 (47): 9586-9592.
[6] Caswell, G. H. (1968). The Storage of Cowpea in the Northern State of Nigeria. Proc. Agric. Soc. Nig. Pp. 4-6.
[7] Dugje, I. Y., L. O. Omoigui, F Ekeleme, A. Y. Kamara, and H. Ajeigbe (2009). Farmers’ Guide to Cowpea Production in West Africa. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, 20 p.
[8] Emeasor, K. C., Emosairue, S. O. and Ogbuji, R. O. (2007). Preliminary Evaluation of the Efficacy of Mixed Seed and Powders of Piper guineense (Schum and Thonn) and Thevetiaperuviana (Persoon) against Callosobruchusmaculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Nigerian Journal of Entomology, 24: 114-118.
[9] Ghaly A. E and Alkoaik F. N (2010). Extraction of Protein from Common Plant Leaves for Useas Human Food. American Journal of Applied Sci., 7 (3): 323-334.
[10] Ileke K. D and Olotuah O. F (2012). Bioactivity of Anacardiumoccidentale (L) and Allium sativum (L) Powders and Oils Extracts against Cowpea Bruchid, Callosobruchusmaculatus (Fab.) [Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae].
[11] Ileke K. D and Oni M. O. (2011). Toxicity of some plant powders to maize weevil, Sitophiluszeamais (motschulsky) [Coleoptera: Curculiondae] on stored wheat grains (Triticumaestivum). African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 6 (13), pp. 3043-3048.
[12] Kochhar S. L. (1981). Economic Botany in the Tropics. 2nd Edition. University of Delhi, London: Macmillan India Ltd. 131pp.
[13] Magloire, N. S. (2005). The Genetic, Morphological and Physiological Evaluation of African Cowpea Genotypes. Thesis presented in accordance with the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae Agriculturae in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Sciences (Plant Breeding) at the University of the Free State, 131p.
[14] Musa, A. K. Oyerinde A. A and Owolabi F. O. (2009). Evaluation of the Efficacy of Mixed Leaf Powders of Vernoniaamygdalina L. And Ocimumgratissimum Del. against Callosobruchusmaculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Academic Journal of Entomology, 2 (2): 85-87.
[15] Odeyemi O. O and Daramola A. M (2000). Storage practices in the tropics: Food storage and pest problems. First Edition, Dave Collins Publication, Nigeria, 2: 235.
[16] Ofuya, T. I. (2003). Beans, insects and man. Inaugural lecture series 35. The Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria, pp 52.
[17] Oparaeke A. M, Dike M. C and Amatobi C. I (2005). Evaluation botanical pesticide mixtures for insect pest management on cowpea plants. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. Vol. 106, no 1.
[18] Yadu, Y. K., Saxena, R. C. Dubey, V. K. and Rana, D. K. (2000). Evaluation of Certain Plant Products against S. Cereallea (Oliv.) in Stored Maize and Paddy. Indian Journal of Agric. Res., 34 (4): 261-263.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Agbede Tomiwa Ounwansuan. (2017). Evaluation of Ripe and Unripe Pawpaw Seeds Powder in the Control of Callosobruchus maculatus in Stored Cowpea. Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering, 1(1), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Agbede Tomiwa Ounwansuan. Evaluation of Ripe and Unripe Pawpaw Seeds Powder in the Control of Callosobruchus maculatus in Stored Cowpea. J. Chem. Environ. Biol. Eng. 2017, 1(1), 22-26. doi: 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Agbede Tomiwa Ounwansuan. Evaluation of Ripe and Unripe Pawpaw Seeds Powder in the Control of Callosobruchus maculatus in Stored Cowpea. J Chem Environ Biol Eng. 2017;1(1):22-26. doi: 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.14,
      author = {Agbede Tomiwa Ounwansuan},
      title = {Evaluation of Ripe and Unripe Pawpaw Seeds Powder in the Control of Callosobruchus maculatus in Stored Cowpea},
      journal = {Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering},
      volume = {1},
      number = {1},
      pages = {22-26},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jcebe.20170101.14},
      abstract = {As alternative to the use of these synthetic insecticides, plant extracts, powders and ash have been used as cheaper and eco-friendly means of controlling C. maculatus infestation of stored cowpea seeds. This study was carried out to investigate the contact toxicity of ripe and unripe pawpaw seeds powder, both at concentration of 0.2g, 0.4g, 0.6g, 0.8g, and 1.0g per 20g of cowpea seeds. The plant powders were effective in controlling the population of C. maculatus at 48 hours of treatment across the treatment concentrations, the unripe pawpaw seeds powder were more effective at the treatment rate of 1.0g in the mortality rate. However, their effectiveness was dependent on dosage rate and period of application. The high mortality rate, reduction in the number of eggs laid, low adult emergence and low seed weight loss achieved by the effects of plant powders on the beetles was directly proportional to the increase in their application rates. The effective control of the activities of C. maculatus in seeds treated with ripe and unripe pawpaw seeds powder may have been due to their toxicity effects.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluation of Ripe and Unripe Pawpaw Seeds Powder in the Control of Callosobruchus maculatus in Stored Cowpea
    AU  - Agbede Tomiwa Ounwansuan
    Y1  - 2017/07/21
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.14
    T2  - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering
    JF  - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering
    JO  - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering
    SP  - 22
    EP  - 26
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-267X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20170101.14
    AB  - As alternative to the use of these synthetic insecticides, plant extracts, powders and ash have been used as cheaper and eco-friendly means of controlling C. maculatus infestation of stored cowpea seeds. This study was carried out to investigate the contact toxicity of ripe and unripe pawpaw seeds powder, both at concentration of 0.2g, 0.4g, 0.6g, 0.8g, and 1.0g per 20g of cowpea seeds. The plant powders were effective in controlling the population of C. maculatus at 48 hours of treatment across the treatment concentrations, the unripe pawpaw seeds powder were more effective at the treatment rate of 1.0g in the mortality rate. However, their effectiveness was dependent on dosage rate and period of application. The high mortality rate, reduction in the number of eggs laid, low adult emergence and low seed weight loss achieved by the effects of plant powders on the beetles was directly proportional to the increase in their application rates. The effective control of the activities of C. maculatus in seeds treated with ripe and unripe pawpaw seeds powder may have been due to their toxicity effects.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Crop, Soil and Pest Management Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria

  • Sections